Originally posted by Bloodraven:
Not at all... you're just risking being disappointed
Originally posted by Bloodraven:Again, that's not asking too much or being ungrateful, at all. But if you're waiting for all that to happen on Montreal 3 (or any show this tour for that matter), you'll probably end up at least a bit disappointed.
Originally posted by Bloodraven:I've never seen anybody arguing that at all.
Originally posted by Bloodraven:I wish they would play something different too, I'm sure I'll enjoy it maybe even more than what they're playing now, but I also can't see what's wrong with what they're playing now.
Originally posted by DMMacdonald:City Of Blinding Lights is too late in the show for me, needs to be earlier, maybe in place of EBTTRT?
Originally posted by RattleandHum1988:I'm definitely up for varied set lists, I don't think anyone should argue otherwise. I only shake my head when I see people getting really pissed or annoyed about it. We've been U2 fans long enough to know that they just aren't that band. To me it could be better, but as it is it's still great. I've definitely seen some negativity here that goes past discussion. It's just a bummer.
Originally posted by patssox95:... this will continue to be my mantra until I see it something different happen.
Originally posted by patssox95: Otherwise it does need to be stated and restated and restated and....
Originally posted by Bloodraven:[..]
you won't see anything different happen.
[..]
in here? Why? I agree with you to some extent, and you've already said it... But why restate it over and over and over and over again in here? Why not twit it everyday to Guy Oseary or to U2 twitter account? We can't do anything about it but agree or argue with you, but it doesn't seem to be what you want, right?
Originally posted by iTim:Well, if anyone has any thought on the setlist other than "I don't care what they play" they risk being disappointed.