Originally posted by cesar_garza01:I don't know why I'm adding more wood to the bonfire, but here I go:
There is a lot of repetition in art, that is true.
Thomas Bernhard used to repeat the same phrases in his novels, sometimes with little variation, one after the other. This was used on purpose to denote weariness, tedium and a contempt for society that now characterizes him.
Cubist painters drew the same object in the canvas superposed one on top of the other to indicate a simultaneity of planes and angles. We could see the object as it is and as it appears to be at the same time.
In music we have some musical pieces with the same melody but played with different instruments to represent different moods. Cellos add some drama and sadness to the music while the same piece with other instruments can bring a sense of hope and joy, etc.
This long diatribe only means that I don't have a problem with repetition if it's something meaningful and you see the purpose behind him. I just don't see why they bring a mundane phrase like "You Are Rock N' Roll" to 2 songs that couldn't be more different thematically. It's like someone said "SOI and SOE are connected, hence why they repeat lyrics" and we took it as an act of faith. To me, the connections are already sensed in songs like Little Things, where the experienced man talks to his innocent self from years ago. I don't sense a purpose on these repetitions.
You can say "I like the song, I don't care if it's the same bridge or chorus" and that's fine, you accept what the song is. I just don't think there's anything "artistic" to this. Just my 2 cents.
P.S. I also think the theory of American Soul being before Volcano is paper thin at best.